Obama must lead the Democrats to the centre…or they risk a massacre in November

Analysis

Debate

Interviews

Opinion

Reviews

Home » Analysis

Obama must lead the Democrats to the centre…or they risk a massacre in November

Submitted by Thomas Haynes on Thursday, 21 January 2010One Comment

(c) Mark Sardella

‘Ouch’ is really the only way to describe the Senate special election result in Massachusetts. There is no way to spin this as anything other than a disaster for the Democrats.

The seat had been in Democrat hands since 1952; in 2006 the late Senator Edward Kennedy won it with 69% of the vote. He actually won every single district within the state, polling at least 62% in them all. Up until last night, it was an extremely safe seat for the Democrats.

Martha Coakley, the Democrat candidate, should have won without any difficulty. Instead she was defeated by Scott Brown, the Republican candidate who was all but unknown just a few weeks ago. The Republicans now have 41 seats in the Senate, allowing them to filibuster key Democrat policies and stall the progress of the majority party’s agenda.

While this is undoubtedly a major setback for the Democrats’ healthcare policy – which is opposed by both the Republicans and a majority of American voters – it also has far wider implications.

A previous post on this site has discussed how Obama’s agenda has alienated Independent voters. It is probably better, however, to talk about ‘the Democrats’ rather than just President Obama. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid – Democrat leaders in the House of Representatives and Senate respectively – have had enormous influence on shaping their party’s policies over the last year. Combined with Obama’s hands-off approach to domestic policy-making and his instinctive support for their liberal stance, this has led the Democrats to pursue policies that are not supported by the American people.

Yesterday’s special election result is a consequence of this. Only one year ago the Republicans were fragmented, demoralised and unpopular after eight years of Bush and a weak campaign by McCain. Independent voters flocked to the Democrats and ensured that they won both the White House and large majorities in Congress. Now, though, Independents are swinging back to the Republicans to register their discontent with the Democrats’ agenda.

If the Democrats continue with their current (unpopular) policies, it is likely that they will suffer heavy defeats in November. All 435 members of the House of Representatives are up for election, as are 37 Senators. If the swing against the Democrats is similar to yesterday’s, they could be walking into an electoral massacre.

In order to retain control of Congress, the Democrats need to move towards the centre. However, as argued on RealClearPolitics, Congress is ill-suited to this task. It is not inherently a national body; it is a forum where district and state representatives are sent to fight their constituents’ corners. Left to Congress, nothing will change: Democrats from liberal states will keep supporting liberal policies.

If the Democrats are to move to the centre and have any chance of retaining Congress in November, therefore, it is President Obama who must lead them there. He must abandon his laissez-faire approach to domestic policy creation and use his position in the White House to advocate moderate, bipartisan solutions to America’s problems (and ideally ones that do not raise taxes or national debt).

Of course, the damage may already have been done. But this is unlikely; the Republicans have gained support because they are vocally opposed to the Democrats’ agenda, not because they have developed a compelling alternative. In November many voters may prefer to support a party with a clear programme, rather than one that just says ‘no’. However, if the Republicans do develop a positive agenda – and the Democrats continue with their unpopular one – it is hard to see Congress remaining in Democrat hands.

This special election result should be a wake-up call for the White House. Exactly one year into his presidency, Obama’s approval ratings have dropped and his party has suffered a massive defeat. If they continue to govern as they have, the Democrats face a potentially crippling defeat in the autumn.

However, if Obama recognises that he is going against public opinion and turns his party towards the centre, he may yet be able to avoid a massacre. The next few months will be crucial, both for his presidency and America’s political trajectory.

Like this post? Like the site? Please take a second to share this article with your friends, it makes a massive difference.

Popularity: 9% [?]

One Comment »

Sean Cable said:

Hi Thomas, I enjoyed reading your article.

However, I think the issue in American politics at the moment is not a newly invigorated Republican Party being bolstered by dislike of Obama’s reforms (there is an element of this however), but more about the perceived distance between the federal law-makers and agenda-setters in Washington and those living on (though I hate this expression) “Main Street”.

This argument was well-made by a Democratic Senator, who said that what has happened is Obama has gone from being a transcendant figure in the public pysche, to another ordinairy politician. His struggle to pass his healthcare reforms, his pledging of 30,000 extra troops to Afghanistan, the enormous fiscal stimulus and the delayed closure of Guantanamo have all helped voters to realise that “Yes We Can!”, is, sometimes, unfortunatley, “Maybe we can’t”.

The massive government involvement in the economy that came about through the stimulus package sits uneasily with most Americans. It is an on-going problem for Americans that Washington seems to have an ever-increasing distance and lack of connection with the rest of America; a problem that began under George Bush and arguably earlier. I would argue that this is a problem for both parties and not just the Democrats; this is evident from the fact that Scott Brown actually made little hay out of the fact that he is a Republican candidate, it appeared on a small amount of his campaign literature.

The Tea Party Movemment is the current craze sweeping across America; it was originally labelled as band of right-wing radicals causing trouble, but its membership is increasingly incorporating more “centrist” voters. At its heart is a very American mistrust of government, which harks back to the very founding of the US. Though many of these Tea Party activists are more ideologically aligned to the Republicans (being as it is, the Party more associated with small government) they do not pledge the allegiance to it with the fervour that was seen in the Newt Gingrich days.

Whilst I agree that the Republicans will be resurgent in the mid-terms, I don’t see this as significant a move against the Democrats as witnessed under Bill Clinton, as it is more a politics-wide protest.

- 21 January 2010 at 3:37 pm